Notifications
Clear all
Topic starter
September 6, 2019 9:14 am
“There is every necessity for a tribunal to make findings and pronounce on material and fundamental issues canvassed before it by the parties because failure to do so may result in a miscarriage of justice. See page 1257 of vol.iii of the record. See also the case of Usman v Umaru (1992) 7 NWLR (Pt.254) 377 at 398-399 paras. F-A where this Court held thus:
“It is now settled that under the doctrine of stare decisis, the court below as an intermediate Court of Appeal between the court below it and this court as final appellate court, is bound by its own decisions..." by PER M. U. PETER-ODILI, J.S.C., in
Exxon Mobil Corporation V Hrh Obong (Dr) Effiong B Archianga & Ors
LER [2018]SC. 631/2014
APPEAL NO: SC. 631/2014 https://legalpediaonline.com/exxon-mobil-corporation-v-hrh-obong-dr-effiong-b-archianga-ors/