DUTY OF COURTS TO R...
 
Notifications
Clear all

DUTY OF COURTS TO REFRAIN FROM COMMENTING ON THE SUBSTANTIVE MATTER WHEN DEALING WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATIONS

1 Posts
1 Users
0 Reactions
619 Views
Joined: 1 second ago
Posts: 0
Topic starter  

“It remains good law and the law is apposite, as established in Amason v. R.T.D.T.C (2009) 17 N.W.L.R. (Pt. 1170) 207 at 211that Courts must refrain from commenting on issues touching on the substantive matter, yet to be tried and disposed of, when dealing with an interlocutory application. The purpose of this rule is the avoidance of prejudicial comments on, or the prejudging of, the substantive matter. PER E.EKO,J.S.C., in

Exxon Mobil Corporation V Hrh Obong (Dr) Effiong B Archianga & Ors

LER [2018]SC. 631/2014

APPEAL NO: SC. 631/2014 https://legalpediaonline.com/exxon-mobil-corporation-v-hrh-obong-dr-effiong-b-archianga-ors/



   
Quote
Share: