Notifications
Clear all
Topic starter
September 6, 2019 9:08 am
“It remains good law and the law is apposite, as established in Amason v. R.T.D.T.C (2009) 17 N.W.L.R. (Pt. 1170) 207 at 211, that Courts must refrain from commenting on issues touching on the substantive matter, yet to be tried and disposed of, when dealing with an interlocutory application. The purpose of this rule is the avoidance of prejudicial comments on, or the prejudging of, the substantive matter. PER E.EKO,J.S.C., in
Exxon Mobil Corporation V Hrh Obong (Dr) Effiong B Archianga & Ors
LER [2018]SC. 631/2014
APPEAL NO: SC. 631/2014 https://legalpediaonline.com/exxon-mobil-corporation-v-hrh-obong-dr-effiong-b-archianga-ors/