Notifications
Clear all
Topic starter
August 21, 2019 8:34 am
"It is therefore settled law that the provisions of Section 127 (1) of the Evidence Act Cap E8 LFN, 2011 is invoked when there is a need to clear the disparity in the evidence before the court. In this case as earlier stated, the matter was at the case- management level when, the order to visit the locus in quo was directed."
PER A.O.OBASEKI-ADEJUMO, J.C.A IN THE CASE OF ARABA SHITTA DADA & 8 ORS .V. ADENIRAN ADEDOKUN VENTURES & 6 ORS
LEGALPEDIA ELECTRONIC CITATION: LER[2019]CA/L/578/2014
