Notifications
Clear all
Topic starter
August 27, 2019 10:04 am
"It is now well settled that an appellate court will not interfere with concurrent findings of two lower courts unless the findings are perverse or erroneous in substance or procedural law. There is no basis, in my opinion for this court to interfere with the concurrent findings of the two lower courts in this case. See Sanyaolu v State (1976) 5 SC 37, Princent v The State (2002) 18 NWLR (pt 798) 19, Amusa v The State (2003) 4 NWLR (pt 811) 595".
PER J.I.OKORO,J.S.C IN THE CASE OF AKINYEDE OLAIYA V THE STATE;LEGALPEDIA CITATION: LER[2017]SC.562/2014