ACCESSORY AFTER THE...
 
Notifications
Clear all

ACCESSORY AFTER THE FACT – DEFINITION OF AN ACCESSORY AFTER THE FACT

2 Posts
1 Users
0 Reactions
505 Views
Joined: 1 second ago
Posts: 0
Topic starter  
"The struggle for the motor cycle did not involve other members of the Police team but was between the deceased and the 3rd convict. The participation of the appellant was when he held no gun.  The evidence of PW1 and PW4 was that he went to the car to collect a gun.  However, it was the 2nd convict who shot.  The Appellant could at best be an accessory after the fact. Abacha Vs. State (2002) LPELR-16(SC) Accessory after the fact was defined as follows:

 

"An accessory after the fact is defined in "The Criminal Law and Procedure of Lagos, Eastern Nigeria and Western Nigeria" by Brett and Mclean as follows: "A person who receives or assists another who is, to his knowledge, guilty of an offence, in order to enable him to escape punishment, is said to become an accessory after the fact to the offence."
 
 
PER Y. B. NIMPAR, J.C.A IN  CPL ENOBONG UDO VS THE STATE

suit no:CA/C/36C/2019
Legalpedia Electronic Citation: (2020) Legalpedia (CA) 19885




   
Quote
Joined: 1 second ago
Posts: 0
Topic starter  

Summary Of Fact:

The Appellant with 3 others were arraigned before the Akwa Ibom High Court, on a two count charge of conspiracy and murder. They were alleged to have killed a commercial motorcyclist while on patrol along Abak Road. That three Police men from the "C" Division of the State Police command on that day opposite the Federal Secretariat, seized 3 motorcycles belonging to some persons, amongst which was the deceased.

Almost immediately, a police car arrived the scene with the Appellant (3rd accused) on the wheels, he met the cyclists struggling with the Policemen who impounded their motorcycles and two cyclists were able to wrestle their motorcycles from the policemen and escaped, leaving the deceased behind with his motorcycle.

The 2nd accused, a senior officer, was Inspector Akpaette Moses sat at the front passenger seat of the police car.

It was in evidence that the 2nd accused fired some shots to scare the crowd that had gathered and the third shot was aimed at the deceased who was hit on the thigh. He died on his way to the teaching hospital.

The 3 other police men joined their colleague in the car and drove away from the scene of crime.

The trial court after hearing of witnesses and consideration of counsel closing addresses, found the Appellant guilty of the two offences charged; namely conspiracy and murder.

He was accordingly sentenced to 14 years for conspiracy and death by hanging for murder.

Dissatisfied with the conviction and sentence, the Appellant appealed to the Court of Appeal, holden at Cabalar via his Amended Noticed of Appeal contending that the evidence presented by the Respondent was deficient and could not have been strong enough to ground his conviction.



   
ReplyQuote
Share: