“It follows that the invitation to this court to interfere with the well grounded concurrent findings of the two courts below is vehemently rejected being baseless. See Idufueko v Pfizer Products Ltd (2014) 1 NWLR(Pt. 1420)96 at 113; Ugba v Suswan(2014) 14 NWLR(Pt. 1427)264 at 315 where it was:

“Decisions in case law are meant to speak volume both in the given situation and for future guidance. Counsel is well advised to desist from filing unnecessary suits which are merely academic and yielding no benefits but mere waste of quality time.” PER M. U. PETER-ODILI, J.S.C., in

ECOBANK NIGERIA LIMITED V ANCHORAGE LEISURES LIMITED & ORS SC.407/2016 https://legalpediaonline.com/ecobank-nigeria-limited-v-anchorage-leisures-limited-ors/