BURDEN OF PROOF UNDER FORFEITURE PROCEEDING - CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE BURDEN OF PROOF UNDER THE ADVANCE FEE FRAUD AND OTHER FRAUD RELATED OFFENCES ACT 2006,ON FORFEITURE PROCEEDINGS
To that extent, the provision of Section 17 of the Advance Fee Fraud and other Fraud Related Offences Act No. 14 of 2006 are neither in conflict with Section 135(1) of the Evidence Act 2011 nor with the provision of Section 36 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 as amended.
There is therefore nothing unusual or unconstitutional in the provision of Section 17 of the Advance Fee Fraud and other Fraud Related Offences Act No. 14 of 2006 imposing on the Appellant the burden of proving particular facts to wit, that the funds sought to be forfeited are not proceeds of unlawful activities."
PER M. A. OWOADE, J.C.A IN TH CASE OF DAME MRS. PATIENCE IBIFAKA JONATHAN V. FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA :LER CA/L/578/2017