“I wish to add that having held that the respondents' fundamental human rights envisaged by Chapter IV of the 1999 Constitution were not infringed, the court below erred in granting the order for perpetual injunction with respect to the same issue it held was not made out in the substantive relief - see Uzoukwu v. Ezeonu II (1991) 6 NWLR (pt.200) 708, where it was held that where injunctions are sought as consequential reliefs to declaratory reliefs, the injunctions will be refused once the declarations are refused.

  PER J. S. IKYEGH. J.C.A IN THE CASE OF CENTRAL BANK OF NIGERIAV. CHIEF DANIEL OBAMENEKE OKEMUO & ANOR; LER:(2016)CA/L/1208/2010